翻訳と辞書 Words near each other ・ R v Stinchcombe ・ R v Stone ・ R v Storrey ・ R v Strachan ・ R v Suberu ・ R v Sullivan ・ R v Sullivan (Canada) ・ R v Sussex Justices, ex p McCarthy ・ R v Swain ・ R v Symonds ・ R v Tang ・ R v Terry ・ R v Tessling ・ R v Therens ・ R v Thomas ・ R v Thomas Equipment Ltd ・ R v Tse ・ R v Turcotte ・ R v Turpin ・ R v Tutton ・ R v U (FJ) ・ R v Vaillancourt ・ R v Van der Peet ・ R v Verity-Amm ・ R v Victor ・ R v Viljoen ・ R v W (D) ・ R v Walker ・ R v Wallace ・ R v Wang Dictionary Lists mini英和辞書 mini和英辞書 Webster 1913 Latin-English FOLDOC Wikipedia English ウィキペディア

翻訳と辞書　辞書検索 [ 開発暫定版 ] スポンサード リンク R v Thomas Equipment Ltd ： ウィキペディア英語版 R v Thomas Equipment Ltd ''R v Thomas Equipment Ltd'', () 2 S.C.R. 529, is a major decision of the Supreme Court of Canada on the extraterritorial limits of the Constitution of Canada. Thomas Equipment Ltd, a farm equipment supplier based on New Brunswick, sold machinery to a reseller in Alberta. Under Alberta law suppliers were required to buy back unsold equipment upon termination of the contract. The New Brunswick supplier argued that as they were not based on Alberta they were not subject to the Alberta law. The majority of the Court held that Alberta law did apply to Thomas Equipment. In the Court's view, the company's decision to supply and market their goods in Alberta caused it to be subject to all the laws of the province. ==See also== * List of Supreme Court of Canada cases 抄文引用元・出典: フリー百科事典『 ウィキペディア（Wikipedia）』 ■ウィキペディアで「R v Thomas Equipment Ltd」の詳細全文を読む スポンサード リンク 翻訳と辞書 : 翻訳のためのインターネットリソース Copyright(C) kotoba.ne.jp 1997-2016. All Rights Reserved.